Zimbabwe’s ICT Minister, Tatenda Mavetera, Under Scrutiny Over Use of “Dr.” Title

Zimbabwe’s Minister of Information Communication Technology (ICT), Tatenda Mavetera, has sparked controversy after being accused of misrepresenting her academic qualifications. The minister has been using the title “Dr.” in public appearances, including on official ministry flyers and in media publications like Business Times. However, Mavetera recently clarified that she is still a PhD candidate, rather than holding a completed doctorate, leading to questions about the legitimacy of using the “Dr.” title prematurely.

Mavetera, who has an Honours Degree in Management and Marketing from the Women’s University in Africa (WUA), a Masters in Strategic Marketing from Midlands State University (MSU), and another Masters in Development Studies from WUA, is currently pursuing a doctorate in Business Leadership, with a focus on Digital Marketing and Information Systems at MSU. Despite her impressive educational background, the use of “Dr.” before completing the PhD has raised eyebrows.

In a recent statement, Mavetera outlined her qualifications:

1. BSc Honours in Management and Marketing (WUA)
2. Masters in Strategic Marketing (MSU)
3. Masters in Development Studies (WUA)
4. PhD candidate in Business Leadership (MSU)
5. Diploma in Shipping, Courier, and Forwarding (ABMA)

This clarification followed a tweet from Mavetera on November 9th, where she listed her qualifications and confirmed her status as a PhD candidate. Prominent lawyer and former legislator, Fadzayi Mahere, publicly questioned why the minister continued to use the “Dr.” title, asking, “Can a PhD candidate use the title ‘Dr.’?” Mahere’s query highlighted a broader concern about the potential for misleading the public about one’s academic credentials.

Mavetera’s situation is reminiscent of a recent scandal involving former Zanu-PF MP Dexter Nduna, who was found to have falsely claimed a law degree from the University of Zimbabwe. Nduna later issued an apology after the university revealed that he had failed several modules, rendering him ineligible to graduate. His apology, however, did little to quell public skepticism over the incident.

The controversy surrounding Mavetera has led to mixed reactions, with some defending her right to use the title while pursuing her doctorate, while others insist that it is misleading to claim the title of “Dr.” without having officially completed the degree. As the debate continues, the case of Mavetera highlights the importance of transparency in academic and professional qualifications, particularly for public officials in high positions.